Eric Boggs
The landscape of college football is constantly evolving, with conference realignment becoming a dominant topic of discussion. The latest speculation suggests that the Big Ten and SEC, two of the sport’s most powerful conferences, might consider removing certain teams in favor of programs that contribute more in terms of fan engagement, television ratings, and overall competitiveness.
This topic was recently explored on The OHIO Podcast, where hosts Eric and Chris debated whether the Big Ten would ever take such drastic action. The discussion stemmed from an article by Andrew Boardwine, which proposed that five teams—two from the SEC and three from the Big Ten—could be on the chopping block in the future.
The discussion on conference realignment comes at a crucial time in college football. The College Football Playoff (CFP) is set to expand to 12 teams in 2024, with further expansion to 14 or even 16 teams being discussed for 2026. The SEC and Big Ten, which already dominate college football, are advocating for multiple automatic bids in the expanded format, ensuring that their teams have a strong presence in the postseason.
However, as the 2031 television rights negotiations approach, these conferences might not only seek further expansion but also look to optimize their membership. With massive media deals at stake, some lower-performing teams could be viewed as expendable, making way for more marketable and competitive programs.
Eric and Chris debated whether the Big Ten, known for its stability and long-standing traditions, would ever make such a drastic move. While Eric remained skeptical, Chris pointed out that if the SEC made the first move, the Big Ten might feel compelled to follow suit.
“I think he’s onto something here,” Chris said. “Right now, the Big Ten and SEC hold all the cards. If the SEC moves first, the Big Ten might respond.”
The debate also considered the Big Ten’s academic and research priorities, which play a significant role in conference decisions. Schools like Northwestern provide immense academic and research value, making their removal unlikely despite potential athletic shortcomings.
According to the article discussed on The OHIO Podcast, the following schools were identified as potential candidates for removal:
SEC Candidates
- Vanderbilt – Despite excelling in baseball and raising the SEC’s academic profile, Vanderbilt’s lackluster football program makes it a potential target.
- Mississippi State – While a competitive team, Mississippi State’s potential removal would hinge on conference restructuring efforts.
Big Ten Candidates
- Northwestern – While a premier academic institution, Northwestern has struggled athletically in recent years, raising questions about its long-term place in the Big Ten.
- Rutgers – Despite its historical significance in college football and improving performance under Greg Schiano, Rutgers’ overall athletic contribution has been questioned.
- Purdue – A surprise inclusion, Purdue’s basketball success makes its removal unlikely, but its football program has been inconsistent.
While Chris believed that realignment could be a reality, Eric dismissed the idea outright.
“I don’t give it a snowball’s chance in hell,” Eric said. “The Big Ten has always stuck together. I just don’t see them kicking teams out.”
The conversation also explored potential trade scenarios, where the Big Ten could swap current members for more competitive programs. Schools like North Carolina, Virginia, and even Notre Dame were floated as possible replacements.
As the power conferences continue to evolve, speculation about team removals and additions will persist. While the idea of the Big Ten or SEC cutting teams seems far-fetched today, the shifting landscape of media rights, NIL, and revenue-sharing models could lead to unprecedented changes.
What do you think? Could the Big Ten or SEC actually remove teams from their conferences? And if so, which teams should be replaced? Join the discussion and let us know your thoughts!
